I just read an incredibly interesting article about the revolutionary thinker Stewart Brand in the NY Times. It talks about his new ideas on the environmental movement, a group he divides in two: the romantics and the scientists.

Mr. Brand predicts that his heresies will become accepted in the next decade as the scientific minority in the environmental movement persuades the romantic majority. He still considers himself a member of both factions, just as in the days of the Merry Pranksters, but he’s been shifting toward the minority.

“My trend has been toward more rational and less romantic as the decades go by,” he says. “I keep seeing the harm done by religious romanticism, the terrible conservatism of romanticism, the ingrained pessimism of romanticism. It builds in a certain immunity to the scientific frame of mind.”

I find the idea really interesting. It’s been a nagging sensation in me for a while now, this idea that eating organic and drinking filtered water won’t save the planet. I mean, it’s obvious, but we do it anyway. But I love what he says, too, about energy, for example. I find myself on the brink of this very same thinking…

“It is one of the great revelatory bets,” he now says. “Any time that people are forced to acknowledge publicly that they’re wrong, it’s really good for the commonwealth. I love to be busted for apocalyptic proclamations that turned out to be 180 degrees wrong. In 1973 I thought the energy crisis was so intolerable that we’d have police on the streets by Christmas. The times I’ve been wrong is when I assume there’s a brittleness in a complex system that turns out to be way more resilient than I thought.”

I guess we’ll just have to do our best. Wait and see. And try not to be overly romantic about organic mineral water from Fiji.

I’m still dreaming of building an off-the-grid cob house on a mesa in the desert, though. No one can convince me that I can’t ward off the apocalypse on my own! :)

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,


Subscribe to comments Comment | Trackback |
Post Tags:

Browse Timeline


  • Oh yes--as someone with a biology background, I have little patience for the muddleheaded nonsense some of my fellow travelers espouse.

    My friend Nick has some further thoughts on Romanticism and how it also is destructive to art and music:

    http://imomus.com/thought100301.html
  • will
    stewart brand is a totally interesting dude. i like that he doesn't freak out about being wrong, or stick with an idea that might be wrong just to save face. there is a lesson there...

    he has a good book called 'how buildings learn' that has some solid observations about how cities tend to adapt in spite of designers and planners... word.
  • Mr. Brand has also been kind enough to endorse my thriller novel of nuclear power, which is based on my twenty years in the US nuclear industry and is designed to provide a good overview of the topic for a lay person. I cover the good AND the bad. It is available free online at http://RadDecision.blogspot.com and also in paperback via online retailers.

    "I'd like to see Rad Decision widely read." - Stewart Brand

    RadDecision.blogspot.com
blog comments powered by Disqus

Creative Commons License

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

This is The Poverty Jet Set. Ride on, space cowboys!
Wordpress theme "Modicus Remix" by Zidalgo.